Item exposure is the quiet failure of a small question bank
A bank that is too small stops measuring knowledge and starts measuring who has seen the questions. The arithmetic is unforgiving and easy to check.
Company
Longer pieces on the parts of assessment software that are harder than they look. No gated downloads.
8 articles
A bank that is too small stops measuring knowledge and starts measuring who has seen the questions. The arithmetic is unforgiving and easy to check.
Proctoring produces evidence about a room, not a verdict about a person. Treating its output as a decision is where institutions get into trouble.
Static hosting removes a class of outage from the pages candidates see first, and costs less than the runtime it replaces.
A model can draft assessment items far faster than a committee can. The bottleneck was never drafting, which is why the savings are smaller than they look.
Assessment traffic arrives as a spike with a deadline attached, and the usual scaling advice assumes a load shape this is not.
If a candidate cannot operate the interface, the score measures the interface. That makes accessibility a measurement concern, not a compliance one.
Scores get corrected — an item is voided, a key is fixed, a session is regraded. Whether that is defensible depends on what was recorded at the time.
Sixty percent is not a standard, it is a habit. Choosing a cut score is a judgement about consequences, and it should be recorded as one.
If any of the above is a problem you are currently having, we are happy to talk about it without a sales process attached.